The Importance of the Modern Era of Political Philosophy Essay Example for Free

The Importance of the Modern while of Political Philosophy EssayThe Modern succession of administrational philosophy is best characterized as a revolt against the traditional constraints of the time. Machiavelli believed that regime should be bump and distinct from ethics, morality, and religion. Protestant reformers such as Luther and Calvin went head to head with the Catholic Church, surface the way for sacred singleism and incorporating various semipolitical revisions. Hobbes called for a major overhaul in England concerning not yet political and religious government issues, but social and economic angiotensin-converting enzymes as well. As novel philosophers began to voice their opinions, Central, Southern, and western sandwich atomic number 63 began to change drasticallychanges that would affect the direction of Western political thought forever.Niccolo Machiavelli, born in Florence, Italy in 1469, was the commencement ceremony political philosopher to recogn ize the importance and potential of the nation-state, an subject he shared with the world. This idea was shared in general through Machiavellis most notable works The Prince and Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livius. The Prince was dedicated to the new Medici (the judgement family in Florence at the time) linguistic ruler, Lorenzo some modern interpreters have viewed the work primarily as a excuse for forgiveness, as Machiavelli wanted his civil attend to job back after being suspected of treason. As indicated in his two major works, Machiavelli had two distinct goals the desire to return to active political science service and the promotion of stability and freedom from foreign encounter, secular or religious, for all of Italy.Martin Luthers (1483-1546) discrepancies with the Catholic Church began previous(predicate) in his career when he attacked the sale of indulgences and also came to the conclusion that human nature is wretched and sinful. He also criticized the popes absolutism and the perform hierarchy. When Luther finally poured his heart out onto paper in 1517, the result was his parameter on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences, otherwise cognize as the Ninety-five Theses, which he promptly nailed to the church door in his hometown of Wittenberg, Germany. Three years later Luther wrote an essayentitled An Appeal to the Ruling Class. separately of these works as well as Luthers other writings made three main allegations against the church. These allegations were known as the Three Walls. The first wall he attacks is the fact that secular power has no control over the pope.The second wall deals with the idea that the church is more than just the pope it encompasses everyone who is a subdivision of the faith. This particular wall disputed the idea of papal infallibility as well as the pope as the sole authority of the church. The third wall Luther confronts concerns the claim that only the pope can summon a council to resolve or address church issues, such as questions of doctrine. Later that same year, the pope excommunicated Luther from the Catholic Church, but not before Luthers words had a significant impact on the Catholic Church. These events pull in Christians to reexamine the relationship between church and state-authority through the eyes of the individual, as well as formation limits on both church and state power.John Calvin, born in 1509, founded one of the first sects of Protestantism that develop after Luthers revamp of the Catholic Church. Calvin shared the belief that human deeds cannot ensure salvation and that government serves as a punishment and remedy for human sin. In his book Institutes of the Christian Religion, Calvin distinguishes two types of government the spiritual, by which the conscience is formed to piety and the service of God and the political, by which a man is instructed in the duties of humanity and civility. Almost overnight, the Protestant Reformation brought the m onolithic foundation of medieval Christianity down, leaving behind some(prenominal) new concepts in political thought.During the first half of the 17th century, English philosopher Thomas Hobbes found run afoul on numerous fronts concerning English society. The first issue was concerning religious freedom, pitting King Charles I and his Anglican Church against a number of independent Protestant sects. Hobbes and his Protestant followers claimed that the Anglican Church was a equivalent close in organization and liturgy to the Catholic Church. They also rejected the claim of Charles I to rule by divine right.The second issue was political in nature, concerning the fact that England did not have a writtenconstitution (and still do not today), thereby allowing for Parliamentary error and inconsistancies. The third issue that Hobbes was concerned with was the fact that social and economic issues were becoming interrelated due to a growing shopping mall class who demanded more politi cal representation in Parliament. During Hobbess lifetime, the world experienced a scientific transition due to important discoveries. The spirit of forward progress influenced Hobbess understanding of politics as well. Hobbes treated his issues like scientific theory, always concerned with precise definitions and correct terminology.On what basis could the practice of government be conducted once society was no longer a community? asks the central philosophical question concerning Hobbess political philosophies. Hobbes reinforces the basis for politics of the Modern Era by uniting absolutism and consent, taking his cues from the scientific conversion of the era. Hobbess most important philosophical work, Leviathan, discusses human nature from the standpoint of the individual, thus defining the foundation for Hobbess political universe. Obviously, Hobbess political focus is on the individual however, some critics argue whether Hobbess philosophies were intended as a scientific blu eprint for a fit government as Hobbes saw it, or if his philosophies merely succeeded in face lift questions about the balance between individual liberty and social order.Of all the versatile philosophers associated with the Modern Era of political philosophy, only Niccolo Machiavelli can be described as the personification of the transformation from the medieval to the modern era. Machiavellis aggregate view of politics focuses on the individual. In contradiction to the values of ancient and medieval political philosophers, Machiavelli establishes a separation between personal morality and necessary political practice. The Florentine also supports the idea of a republican state, thus allowing the greatest degree of liberty. He created a new science of politics with a more down-to-earth and practical set of principles. Machiavellis recognition of the importance and potential of the nation-state not only set him apart from his predecessors, but also ushered in a new era of political thought, paving the way toward the unfoldingWestern political tradition.The importance of the Modern Era of political philosophy is patently evident in todays society. A large part of the Constitution of the United States is based on the free-handed philosophies of the Modern Era. The idea of separation of church and state is most prolific during this era, and it remains today one of the fundamental principles of liberty upon which the governments of the United States and numerous other nation-states in the West are based. Also, the focus of individual liberty is very apparent in many of the political discourses of the Modern philosophers. Had the philosophers of the Modern Era not battled the widespread corruption apparent in the Catholic Church and the ruling classes across Europe, who is to say that the Western political tradition would have unfolded at all?