Mid term constitutional law 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Mid term constitutional law 3 - Essay ExampleThere are two wide-ranging places on the right for a person to hold and carry weapons, those who agree with this right and those against it (Bogus, 2000). Those for this view contend that individuals need guns for their self protection within the marches of their residences and that so long as they keep these weapons dismantled and not functioning, on that point is no cause for alarm. Others who love hunting as a sport argue that they need their guns for this purpose reasoning that as long as they are doing it strictly on their property there is no danger posed by the usage of their weapons. Consequently, both these groups of people in favor of this right maintain that owning a weapon is their fundamental freedom right (Halbrook, 1989).On the other hand, those against this view argue that the Second Amendment has no control on criminals and the mentally challenged possessing weapons neither does it help deter people carrying weapons wh ile entering institutions and buildings or moving near freely with a firearm. They also maintain that Second Amendment fails to provide provisions that govern weapons being sold. For instance, person may acquire an unlicensed weapon illicitly and use it to commit a crime then use the second amendment right as defense alleging that his rights were infringed upon by quoting the Bill of Rights (Halbrook, 1989).The stance I visualize convincing is the one that is against the possession of weapons despite the reasons for ownership. For one, this is extremely dangerous especially if the weapon is kept at home, and minors have access to it (Bogus, 2000). Then there is the probability of it going off unexpectedly and injuring an innocent person. There have been several cases in learning institutions where innocent students and teachers have been killed or injured by a student carrying a weapon to school (Halbrook, 1989). Further still, there are no clear provisions that govern the weapon s being sold.I call up that rights should also have some